Economic Valuation of Shoreline

Abstract

SHORELINE development is a growing public policy issue in many urban areas. While there is some published research on a related topic, the importance of ambient water quality, economists have not yet turned their attention to the economic significance of the existence and width of the undeveloped apron offering public use and access to bodies of water in urban areas. There are several important issues to be considered here. May we expect the urban land market to provide a solution which is Pareto efficient? Have public agencies through zoning and other building restrictions acted in a socially optimal way? What contribution can studies of the determinants of property values make to our understanding of these issues? We begin an exploration of these issues and present some empirical results that enhance our knowledge of the economics of water-related open space. More generally. this paper extends recent economic work that has produced quantitative measures of value for phenomena hitherto restricted to qualitative expression. The process of transforming qualitative into quantitative knowledge, so essential to an empirical science as to be one of its distinguishing features, is well illustrated by the work of Cobb and Douglas on production (1928); Griliches (1961) on the qualitative characteristics of automobiles; and Fogel and Engerinan's (1974) controversial piece on slavery.' With respect to hotusing, implicit prices of each attribute contained in the bundle of housing services have been estimated by hedonic price regressions in the spirit of the work by Lancaster (1971) and others.2 In the following sections we first examine the choice of housing attributes, including waterrelated open space and proximity to bodies of water, faced by a household in a metropolitan area. Next, the process of implicit price formation is examined, and, employing data on individual dwelling units in a metropolitan area with numerous bodies of water, these implicit prices are estimated. We then turn to the question of what can and cannot be inferred from these results about the demand for open space and the welfare gains or losses resulting from possible changes in the amount of water-related open space.