Abstract
This article presents an empirical analysis of the relationship between economic interdependence and international third-party interactions. If countries seek to protect their trade gains, the tradeconflict model predicts that trade reduces conflict between pairs of countries, designated “actors” and “targets”. This paper extends the trade-conflict model to garner implications concerning trade and conflict interactions where third parties are involved. The theoretical propositions supported by proofs are as follows: (1) Increasing trade by an “actor” with a third party will decrease conflict with a “target”, if the third party and target are “friends”, who already have a negative level of mutual conflict. (2) Increasing trade with a third party will increase conflict with a target, if the third party and target are “rivals”, having a positive level of mutual conflict. A similar relationship is also discussed and tested if conflict increases or decreases between the actor and third party. The empirical results of tests using a 30-country sample from the Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) generally support the hypotheses. Trade increases communication between states and promotes peace. Therefore, according to the implications of structural balance theory, the imbalance in a triadic relationship can be resolved by international trade. Thus, increasing world trade will give positive effect to the maxim: “a friend of a friend is a friend”.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.