Abstract

Objective The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in IBD. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify economic evaluations of IBD therapy. The literature search was performed using electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. Searches were limited to full economic evaluations published in English or French between 2004 and 2016. Results A total of 5,403 potentially relevant studies were identified. After screening titles and abstracts, 48 studies were included, according to the eligibility criteria. A total of 56% and 42% of the studies were assessing treatments of UC or CD, respectively. Treatment options under evaluation included biological agents, mesalamine, immunosuppressants, and surgery. The majority of studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of biological treatments. Biological therapies were dominant in 23% of the analyses and were cost-effective according to a $CAD50,000/QALY and $CAD100,000/QALY threshold in 41% and 62% of the analyses, respectively. Conclusion This literature review provided a comprehensive overview of the economic evaluations for the different treatment options for IBD over the past 12 years and represents a helpful reference for future economic evaluations.

Highlights

  • Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic, progressive, and disabling inflammatory conditions that affect the gastrointestinal (GI) track

  • The review question was established using the PICO method [67]: population consisted of patients with IBD; interventions and comparators were standard therapies for IBD; outcomes of interest were results of cost-utility analyses (CUA), cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), cost-minimization analyses (CMA), costconsequence analyses (CCA), or cost-benefit analyses (CBA)

  • CUA were expressed in terms of cost per QALY whereas CEA were expressed in terms of cost per remission, cost per response, cost per life year gained (LYG), cost per mucosal healing (MH), or cost per days without symptoms or steroids (DWSS)

Read more

Summary

Objective

As the economic burden of IBD is significant, numerous economic evaluations assessing the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in IBD have been performed during the past years. The objective of this literature review was to explore the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of these treatments

Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.