Abstract

In this study, biorefinery as a concept is applied to thermomechanical pulp (TMP)-based paper production to evaluate the possibility of co-production of synthetic natural gas (SNG), electricity and district heating in addition to mechanical pulp and paper. The combined heat and power plant (CHP) associated to TMP is replaced by a biomass-to-SNG (BtSNG) plant. Implementing BtSNG in a mechanical pulp production line might improve the profitability of a TMP mill and also help to commercialize the BtSNG technology by taking into account of some key issues such as biomass availability, heat utilization, etc. A TMP + BtSNG mathematical model is developed with ASPEN Plus. The model prediction shows that the scale of the TMP + BtSNG mill and SNG price are two strong factors for the implementation of BtSNG in a TMP mill. A BtSNG plant associated to a TMP mill should be built at a scale above 100 MW of biomass thermal input. For the case of Swedish economic condition, commercialization of SNG production as a transport biofuel has not matured yet. Political instruments to support commercialization of transport biofuel are necessary.

Highlights

  • The possibility of producing transport fuels from biomass and wastes has become a more and more important issue with regard to the global challenges of energy security and climate change

  • Compared to the results of the case of Thermomechanical Pulp (TMP) + biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC), represented by the dashed curves in Figures 6c,d, the net revenue (NR) and internal return rate (IRR) of TMP + BtSNG are much lower. This is attributed to three reasons: (1) the specific investment cost is much higher for BtSNG; (2) the electricity certificate instrument in Sweden has added a credit to the electricity 1p2r8od0u5ction, and (3) much more district heating (DH) is produced by BIGCC, and DH has a price unusually high

  • Compared to the results of the case of TMP + BIGCC, represented by the dashed curves in Figure 6c,d, the NR and IRR of TMP + BtSNG are much lower. This is attributed to three reasons: (1) the specific investment cost is much higher for BtSNG; (2) the electricity certificate instrument in Sweden has added a credit to the electricity production; and (3) much more DH is produced by BIGCC, and DH has a price unusually high

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The possibility of producing transport fuels from biomass and wastes has become a more and more important issue with regard to the global challenges of energy security and climate change. Scale, and energy prices, the most economic configuration may provide a net SNG yield of 66% to 75% from wood (based on lower heating value (LHV) of the dry substance). The scale has expanded rapidly in recent years This provides an excellent infrastructure and market opportunity for bio-SNG production as a transport fuel. To substantially reduce specific electricity consumption (SEC) while maintaining pulp quality is the most important issue for the high-yield pulp and paper industry [5]. The Fibre Science and Communication Network (FSCN) at Mid Sweden University, together with Scandinavian forest and pulp & paper companies and research institutes, is running a large research program with the goal of showing how to design the TMP and CTMP production lines of the future to reduce SEC by 50%. Three cases are studied: 1) Sctahleinfegasoifbitlhitey TofMbPiom+ aBstsSgNaGsifimcaitlilo;n-based technology to produce CH4 in a TMP mill is evaluated 2) AdanddincgomthpearreedjewcitthfiTbMrePs +inBtIhGeCgCaisniftieerrm; s of the technical and economic aspects. 3) DecreaAsiTnMgPth+eBTtSMNPG‐smpaetchiefmicaetilceacltrmicoidtyel cisondseuvemloppteidonw(itShEACS)PbEyNuPplutso. 5B0y%m.eans of modeling, three cases are studied: The p1r)ofSictaalbinilgitoyf othfethTMe TPM+ BPtS+NBGtSmNilGl; mill is analyzed in comparison with a previously studied TMP + BIG2C) CAdmdiilnlg. the reject fibres in the gasifier; 3) Decreasing the TMP-specific electricity consumption (SEC) by up to 50%

Process Design and Simulation
Gasification
Gas Cleaning
Methanation
Upgrading
Simulation with ASPEN Plus
Economic Evaluation
Results and Discussion
Economic of Scale
Reject Fibers to Gasifier
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.