Economic Evaluation of in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) and Neosalpingostomy for Bilateral Tubal Obstruction

Abstract

Objectives: to determine the reproductive outcome and estimate the cost for a Jive birth after a single IVF-ET cycle and neosalpingostomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy in patients with bilateral tubal obstruction.Design: retrospective review of medical records.Setting: tertiary reproductive medicine university institute.Patients: three cohorts of infertility patients, treated for bilateral tubal obstruction were compared. Thirty-seven patients with bilateral distal tubal obstruction were treated between July 1990 and July 1994 with laparoscopic bilateral neosalpingostomy using a Coherent ultra-pulse CO2 laser. Seventy-two patients with bilateral distal tubal obstruction had undergone neosalpingostomy prior to July 1990 by laparotomy, using the CO2 laser and microsurgical techniques. One hundred and twenty-seven patients with all forms of bilateral tubal obstruction were treated with a single cycle of IVF-ET in the same institute between July 1990 and December 1994. The three groups were comparable in female age and length of infertility.Results: the live birth rate was 19 percent (14 of 72), 22 percent (8 of 37) and 19 percent (24 of 127), and the ectopic pregnancy rate was seven percent (5 of 72), eight percent (3 of 37) and three percent (4 of 127) for the laparotomy, laparoscopy and IVF-ET cycle groups, respectively. The estimated cost for alive birth was $10,497 following laparoscopy, while it was $29,532 and $28,300 following laparotomy and IVF-ET, respectively.Conclusions: the reproductive performance following bilateral laparoscopic neosalpingostomy is at least equal to the pregnancy rate following neosalpingostomy via laparotomy and a single IVF-ET cycle. The least expensive live birth is associated with laparoscopic neosalpingostomy.