Abstract

BackgroundUrinary tract infections are a leading cause of medical consultations in Mexico and the growth of antimicrobial resistance results in increased morbidity and rising costs. AimTo make an economic evaluation of ceftibuten as treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in adults, from the perspective of the Mexican private health system. MethodsA cohort-based decision-making model was developed to compare ceftibuten with TMP-SMX, ciprofloxacin, and cefalexin. Effectiveness was measured using local susceptibility rates of Escherichia coli. Costs were obtained from official market value data and converted to 2014 USD values. Incremental analysis was employed to determine if ceftibuten was a worthwhile investment on the part of the private health system in Mexico. ResultsThe total expected cost per patient for ciprofloxacin was $116 USD and the corresponding costs for TMP/SMX and cefalexin were $92.40 USD and $74.80 USD, respectively. Ceftibuten had a lower expected cost ($34.50 USD) and a higher percentage of therapeutic success (99.4%), compared with ciprofloxacin 21%, cefalexin 41%, and TMP/SMX 31.7%. ConclusionsEven though ceftibuten has a higher market price than other antimicrobials in Mexico, it can represent possible savings by avoiding the costs associated with undesirable results due to antimicrobial resistance to E. coli.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call