Abstract

ObjectiveTo conduct an economic evaluation of the Enabling Self-Management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise (ESCAPE-knee pain) program.MethodsAlongside a clinical trial, we estimated the costs of usual primary care and participation in ESCAPE-knee pain delivered to individuals (Indiv-rehab) or groups of 8 participants (Grp-rehab). Information on resource use and informal care received was collected during face-to-face interviews. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility were assessed from between-group differences in costs, function (primary clinical outcome), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed to represent uncertainty around cost-effectiveness.ResultsRehabilitation (regardless of whether Indiv-rehab or Grp-rehab) cost £224 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] £184, £262) more per person than usual primary care. The probability of rehabilitation being more cost-effective than usual primary care was 90% if decision makers were willing to pay £1,900 for improvements in functioning. Indiv-rehab cost £314/person and Grp-rehab £125/person. Indiv-rehab cost £189 (95% CI £168, £208) more per person than Grp-rehab. The probability of Indiv-rehab being more cost-effective than Grp-rehab increased as willingness to pay (WTP) increased, reaching 50% probability at WTP £5,500. The lack of differences in QALYs across the arms led to lower probabilities of cost-effectiveness based on this outcome.ConclusionProvision of ESCAPE-knee pain had small cost implications, but it was more likely to be cost-effective in improving function than usual primary care. Group rehabilitation reduces costs without compromising clinical effectiveness, increasing probability of cost-effectiveness.

Highlights

  • Chronic knee pain is a major cause of disability [1,2,3,4,5,6].Health and social care expenditure [3,7,8,9] on this condi-ISRCTN: 94658828

  • We have demonstrated that a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, patient education, and self-management strategies (Enabling Self-Management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain Through Exercise [ESCAPE-knee pain]) improves functioning [24,25]

  • Clinical, and sociodemographic characteristics were balanced across trial arms; baseline mean age was 66 years, mean height 1.64 meters, body mass 81 kg, body mass index 30 kg/m2, WOMAC-func 27.2 points, and median duration of symptoms was 6 years

Read more

Summary

Objective

To conduct an economic evaluation of the Enabling Self-Management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise (ESCAPE-knee pain) program. We estimated the costs of usual primary care and participation in ESCAPE-knee pain delivered to individuals (Indiv-rehab) or groups of 8 participants (Grp-rehab). Rehabilitation (regardless of whether Indiv-rehab or Grp-rehab) cost £224 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] £184, £262) more per person than usual primary care. The probability of rehabilitation being more cost-effective than usual primary care was 90% if decision makers were willing to pay £1,900 for improvements in functioning. The probability of Indiv-rehab being more cost-effective than Grp-rehab increased as willingness to pay (WTP) increased, reaching 50% probability at WTP £5,500. Provision of ESCAPE-knee pain had small cost implications, but it was more likely to be cost-effective in improving function than usual primary care. Group rehabilitation reduces costs without compromising clinical effectiveness, increasing probability of cost-effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.