Abstract

What explains the emergence and persistence of institutions aimed at preventing any ruling group from using the state apparatus to advance particularistic interests? To answer this recurring question, a burgeoning literature examines the establishment of power-sharing institutions in societies divided by ethnic or religious cleavages. Going beyond existing scholarly work focused on these specific settings, we argue that political power-sharing institutions can also be the result of common disputes within the economic elite. We propose that these institutions are likely to emerge and persist when competition between elite factions with dissimilar economic interests is balanced. To address the possibility of endogeneity between elite configurations and public institutions, we leverage natural resource diversity as an instrument for elite configurations. We show that, where geological resources are more diverse, competition between similarly powerful economic groups is more likely to emerge, leading ultimately to the establishment of power-sharing mechanisms that allow elite groups to protect their diverging economic interests.

Highlights

  • Scholars of democracy have long been interested in the ability of ruling social groups to abuse the power of the state

  • We suggest that the existence of power-sharing institutions—a sign of good governance and institutional quality (Rose-Ackerman, 2017)—paradoxically, might be the result of economic elites’ successful attempts to ensure representation of their interests in the political system, which is fundamentally different from more common understandings of democratic accountability that focus on how democratic institutions are accountable to the broad masses

  • We argue that the composition of economic elites is a key determinant of the constitutional design of sharing political power

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scholars of democracy have long been interested in the ability of ruling social groups to abuse the power of the state. Countries with low resource diversity tend to give rise to a monolithic elite and, to low intra-elite competition, indicated by high levels of market concentration Using this instrumental variable approach, and drawing on Strøm, Gates, Graham, and Strand’s (2017) operationalization of power-sharing institutions as (1) dispersive, (2) constraining, and (3) inclusive, we find support for our argument. Countries that enjoy high resource diversity tend to give rise to more symmetric competition among economic elites As a consequence, they develop institutions aimed at protecting elite subgroups that are not in power from those groups who are. We conclude by summarizing our contributions to the literature and by discussing opportunities for future research

Intra‐elite balance of power and power‐sharing institutions
Empirical analysis
The dependent variable: power‐sharing institutions
The explanatory variable: intra‐elite balance of power
The instrument: resource diversity
Other covariates
Estimation
Results
Other robustness tests
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call