Abstract

Livestock traceability has increasingly become a focus for the USDA, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, high-volume beef-exporting states, and other beef industry stakeholders. The focus on traceability within the United States (U.S.) began after several international animal disease outbreaks and continues to be of importance with highly infectious diseases spreading across the globe. Mitigating adverse future disease outbreaks and food safety events, as well as maintaining export markets through a positive international perception of U.S. beef has become a top priority. Implementing a national animal identification (ID) and traceability program would enable the industry to track and reduce the potential losses due to an outbreak or event. However, such a system comes at a cost, mainly to cow-calf producers. This study utilizes a partial equilibrium model to determine the impacts of a beef cattle animal ID and traceability system in the United States. Utilizing an economic model allows us to provide a comparison of how the various beef sectors would need to respond to offset the costs of a national animal ID and traceability program. Assuming no changes in domestic and international demand for U.S. beef, producers at the wholesale, slaughter, and feeder levels lose $475 million, $1,143 million, and $1,291 million, respectively, in a 10-year discounted cumulative producer surplus. A 17.7 and 1.9% increase in international and domestic beef demand would be required to completely offset the producer costs of CattleTrace, respectively.

Highlights

  • The United States (U.S.) is relatively “behind” other countries in implementing a national animal identification (ID) and traceability program

  • This is because the U.S beef industry is the only industry with an increase in costs as a result of CattleTrace

  • All changes in prices and quantities within the beef industry are consistent with an increase in CattleTrace costs at the wholesale, slaughter and farm levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The United States (U.S.) is relatively “behind” other countries in implementing a national animal identification (ID) and traceability program. Despite the lack of a national animal ID and traceability program, U.S beef has remained internationally competitive and generally accepted as a safe source. This, along with fear of increased cost and other long-term implications, has led some industry stakeholders to disapprove of potential government-mandated animal ID and traceability programs (Golan et al, 2004). The principal product of cow-calf operations is weaned calves, which are subsequently sold to stockers, backgrounders, or feedlots. Some calves from cow-calf operations are transferred directly to feedlots at, or around, the time of weaning, in which case, they are referred to as “calf-feds” that remain in the feedlot prior to being harvested

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call