Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the direct and indirect costs of sickle cell disease (SCD) in Saudi Arabia. MethodsData were collected from 217 participants aged ≥18 years in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, using a prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach. The Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire were used to assess costs. A multistage process was used, encompassing patient data collection over 3 months, cost calculation from clinic visits and drug prices, and extrapolation for annual estimates. ResultsThe study revealed substantial societal costs of SCD, with an average per-patient cost of SAR181 899 (US$48 506), covering healthcare and productivity losses. Healthcare costs, including hospitalization, informal care, and medication, averaged SAR80 306 (US$21 415). In addition, productivity costs, including unpaid work and presenteeism, averaged SAR101 594 (US$27 092). Obtaining higher levels of education, such as a diploma and BSc degree or higher, has been found to significantly decrease the costs associated with SCD (P = .016, P = .001). Furthermore, when comparing different employment statuses, students (B = −0.301, P = .058) were found to have marginally lower SCD costs, suggesting that their expenses were lower than those of individuals in other employment categories. The predictive model used in this study explained 11.2% of the variation in costs. ConclusionOur study highlights a significant economic burden of SCD in Saudi Arabia and highlights the need for targeted strategies to alleviate financial challenges and improve patient well-being.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.