Economic Burden Associated With Untreated Mental Illness in Indiana

Abstract

There is a paucity of systematically captured data on the costs incurred by society-individuals, families, and communities-from untreated mental illnesses in the US. However, these data are necessary for decision-making on actions and allocation of societal resources and should be considered by policymakers, clinicians, and employers. To estimate the economic burden associated with untreated mental illness at the societal level. This cross-sectional study used multiple data sources to tabulate the annual cost of untreated mental illness among residents (≥5 years old) in Indiana in 2019: the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the National Survey of Children's Health, Indiana government sources, and Indiana Medicaid enrollment and claims data. Data analyses were conducted from January to May 2022. Direct nonhealth care costs (eg, criminal justice system, homeless shelters), indirect costs (unemployment, workplace productivity losses due to absenteeism and presenteeism, all-cause mortality, suicide, caregiver direct health care, caregiver productivity losses, and missed primary education), and direct health care costs (disease-related health care expenditures). The study population consisted of 6 179 105 individuals (median [SD] age, 38.0 [0.2] years; 3 132 806 [50.7%] were women) of whom an estimated 429 407 (95% CI, 349 526-528 171) had untreated mental illness in 2019. The economic burden of untreated mental illness in Indiana was estimated to be $4.2 billion annually (range of uncertainty [RoU], $2.1 billion-$7.0 billion). The cost of untreated mental illness included $3.3 billion (RoU, $1.7 billion-$5.4 billion) in indirect costs, $708.5 million (RoU, $335 million-$1.2 billion) in direct health care costs, and $185.4 million (RoU, $29.9 million-$471.5 million) in nonhealth care costs. This cross-sectional study found that untreated mental illness may have significant financial consequences for society. These findings put into perspective the case for action and should be considered by policymakers, clinicians, and employers when allocating societal resources and funding. States can replicate this comprehensive framework as they prioritize key areas for action regarding mental health services and treatments.