Abstract

Purpose. To assess the economic profitability of a new computerized mattress system in patients with spinal cord injuries(SCI) by comparison with two other alternatives, as an example of the use of a quantitative approach for decision-making inchoosing between alternatives for sore prevention.Method. The cost of achieving one day without signs of impending pressure sore was compared between the alternativeoptions using cost minimization analysis. Savings in nursing costs for the three options were calculated for cost-benefitanalysis.Results. A foam mattress system is significantly cheaper than the other examined alternatives, and if the nursing manpowercost is constant and the nursing staff is capable of performing sufficient repositionings, this system would achieve the desiredmedical outcome at a minimal cost. However, if the nursing staff cannot perform sufficient repositionings, or if the use ofnursing manpower can be adjusted to the actual need, then it is the computerized mattress system that achieves the desiredoutcome at the minimal cost. In this case, less than 20 New Israeli Shekels (NIS) per day spent on the equipment save NIS45 per day in labor costs.Conclusions. The economic evaluation indicates that the computerized mattress system is advisable for patients with SCIwho require assistance for repositioning, but its profitability depends on the employment terms of the nursing manpower. Inaddition, other possible alternative pressure management systems should be examined, and additional research may beneeded to determine the optimal combination of such systems for a spinal cord rehabilitation department.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.