Abstract
Development of unconventional shale gas resources involves intensive capital investment accompanying large commercial production uncertainties. Economic appraisal, bringing together multidisciplinary project data and information and providing likely economic outcomes for various development scenarios, forms the core of business decision-making. This paper uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to evaluate the economic outcome of shale gas development in the Horn River Basin, northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Through numerical examples, this study demonstrates that the use of a single average decline curve for the whole shale gas play is the equivalent of the results from a random drilling process. Business decision based on a DCF model using a single decline curve could be vulnerable to drastic changes of shale gas productivity across the play region. A random drilling model takes those drastic changes in well estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and decline rates into account in the economic appraisal, providing more information useful for business decisions. Assuming a natural gas well-head price of $4/MCF and using a 10 % discount rate, the results from this study suggest that a random drilling strategy (e.g., one that does not regard well EURs), could lead to a negative net present value (NPV); whereas a drilling sequence that gives priority to developing those wells with larger EURs earlier in the drilling history could result in a positive NPV with various payback time and internal rate of return (IRR). Under a random drilling assumption, the breakeven price is $4.2/MCF with more than 10 years of payout time. In contrast, if the drilling order is strictly proportional to well EURs, the result is a much better economic outcome with a breakeven price below the assumed well-head price accompanied by a higher IRR.
Highlights
Recent advances in horizontal drilling coupled with multistage hydraulic fracturing have extended our ability to produce commercial oil and natural gas from low porosity– permeability fine-grained reservoirs
Assuming a natural gas well-head price of $4/MCF and using a 10 % discount rate, the results from this study suggest that a random drilling strategy, could lead to a negative net present value (NPV); whereas a drilling sequence that gives priority to developing those wells with larger estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) earlier in the drilling history could result in a positive NPV with various payback time and internal rate of return (IRR)
In the shale gas development economic analysis, we present two scenarios of utilizing a simple mean production decline model and a random drilling process to illustrate the advantages of including full range of variations in well EUR and production decline on economic outcomes of the same shale gas play
Summary
Recent advances in horizontal drilling coupled with multistage hydraulic fracturing have extended our ability to produce commercial oil and natural gas from low porosity– permeability fine-grained reservoirs. In recent years since the start of the shale gas boom, methods and procedures of economic feasibility evaluation of shale gas development have been proposed and examples of economic appraisals of North American shale plays are publically available in literature as well as from industry reports. Hammond (2013) used a DCF model to evaluate shale gas production well economics He breaks down the breakeven natural gas price by year and shale play to illustrate the variability of economic outcomes in the major North American shale plays. This paper presents a probabilistic model for shale gas development economic evaluation by considering the differences in well EUR and natural gas productivity due to variable geological/reservoir characteristics across a basin. Alternative functions for modeling natural gas price trends and background on what drives regional natural gas prices are highlighted in EIA (2014) and Weijermars (2013)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.