Abstract
Precision farming may play an important role in agricultural innovation. The study focuses on the attitude of Hungarian farmers toward precision farming. Based on the relevant technical literature, we performed a nationally representative questionnaire survey of 594 farmers and deep interviews with experts and farmers (30 persons). As regards the questionnaire, the authors found that the management of the average farm size in Hungary has the highest willingness to innovate and the second highest level of education among the developed clusters. The survey shows undertrained farmers with large farms to be the second most open group, which may result in the partial application of precision farming techniques. One of the most unexpected results of the Precision Farmers’ cluster is that the positive socio-economic utility of precision farming is rated as extremely low. In-depth interviews prove that the use of precision technologies does not increase local social cohesion. Strong organisational isolation of precision farmers prevents the spread of innovation knowledge and precision farming amongst the farming community, and the challenges of competitiveness alone do not force farmers to apply precision farming. Our results may be useful for the establishment of agricultural strategy.
Highlights
This study deals with the social conditions of precision farming (PF) and the coherent agricultural policy environment through the example of Hungarian agriculture
As a result of the combined method, we developed a typology describing the openness of the host society to precision farming alongside of a cluster analysis based on quantitative data collection
The survey shows undertrained farmers with large farms to be the second most open group, which may result in the partial application of precision farming techniques
Summary
This study deals with the social conditions of precision farming (PF) and the coherent agricultural policy environment through the example of Hungarian agriculture. By the time of the country’s EU accession in 2004, land use concentration had become significant [3]. Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (SAPARD) programme and EU agricultural subsidies allowed for greater investment in innovation, resulting in larger family farms and agro-businesses becoming more internationally competitive. This period can be considered the first innovation period after the turn of the millennium, for which EU funds provide a certain continuity. In addition to the technical literature review, a questionnaire survey involving 604 farmers and tape-recorded interviews with experts and farmers (30 people) were conducted in order to analyse this move
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
