EComment. Prevention of sternal wound infection

Abstract

We read with great interest the article by Sakic et al. [1] assessing the efficacy of surgical modifications on the incidence of postoperative sternal complications after bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) harvesting. In this single-center retrospective study, the authors demonstrated that using a skeletonized approach in patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic arteries with augmented sternal wires is effective in preventing sternal wound complications. As described by others, this series supports the claim that the risk of sternal infection can be reduced by performing internal thoracic artery harvested in a skeletonized manner. Deo et al. [2] conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to address the essential clinical question of whether BITA increases the risk of deep sternal wound infection in patients with diabetes; they concluded that the risk may be minimized using a skeletonized approach. The left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery graft has long been established as the cornerstone of improved early and late outcomes in surgically-treated patients. An overwhelming wealth of evidence, mainly retrospective studies, demonstrated that the use of BITA as bypass grafts provided superior early survival and better event-free survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. The Arterial Revascularization Trial [3] is the only randomized study comparing the outcomes of single internal mammary artery (SITA) vs BITA, with a primary outcome of survival at 10 years, and results should be available in five years. The risk of sternal wound complications may need to be weighed against the long-term benefit of BITA grafts. It is, needless to say, that anterior mediastinitis is a rare but ominous complication after BITA harvesting, carrying a high risk of in-hospital mortality. Many factors have been suggested as responsible for postcardiotomy sternal wound infection, and investigations to prevent this dreaded complication are still considered as a greatly researched topic in cardiac surgery. Recently, Grauhan et al. [4] investigated the efficacy of a new commercially available negative pressure wound therapy system (Prevena Incision Management System; KCI, San Antonio, USA) as a dressing treatment to prevent sternal wound infection in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery. They showed in a prospective study that the application of a special foam as a wound dressing immediately after skin closure and negative pressure of -125 mmHg for the first 6 to 7 days postoperatively significantly reduces the incidence of sternal infection in this high-risk patient population. The technique of skeletonization during BITA harvest preserves sternal microacirculation [5]; the immediate application of a negative-pressure wound dressing after suturing prevents the breakdown of skin sutures and seepage of bacteria into the deeper layers. These two different methods showed to be effective in reducing the likelihood of sternal wound infection, and should be considered in high-risk patients of sternal complications. Conflict of interest: none declared.