Abstract

In nature, many multicellular and unicellular organisms use constitutive defenses such as armor, spines, and noxious chemicals to keep predators at bay. These defenses render the prey difficult and/or dangerous to subdue and handle, which confers a strong deterrent for predators. The distinct benefit of this mode of defense is that prey can defend in place and continue activities such as foraging even under imminent threat of predation. The same qualitative types of armor-like, spine-like, and noxious defenses have evolved independently and repeatedly in nature, and we present evidence that cancer is no exception. Cancer cells exist in environments inundated with predator-like immune cells, so the ability of cancer cells to defend in place while foraging and proliferating would clearly be advantageous. We argue that these defenses repeatedly evolve in cancers and may be among the most advanced and important adaptations of cancers. By drawing parallels between several taxa exhibiting armor-like, spine-like, and noxious defenses, we present an overview of different ways these defenses can appear and emphasize how phenotypes that appear vastly different can nevertheless have the same essential functions. This cross-taxa comparison reveals how cancer phenotypes can be interpreted as anti-predator defenses, which can facilitate therapy approaches which aim to give the predators (the immune system) the upper hand. This cross-taxa comparison is also informative for evolutionary ecology. Cancer provides an opportunity to observe how prey evolve in the context of a unique predatory threat (the immune system) and varied environments.

Highlights

  • Most organisms experience the risk of mortality from predators

  • We argue that cancer cells should and do evolve the equivalence of armor, spines, and noxiousness

  • Matz et al (2008) found that violacein production per bacterium was 3–59 times higher for cells in biofilms than planktonic cells. As they do for multicellular species, armored, spiny and noxious defenses allow microorganisms to defend in place, a behavior that is especially useful when foraging from resourcerich patches, or when a microorganism is sessile

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Most organisms experience the risk of mortality from predators. In response to this risk, natural selection has imbued prey with a strikingly broad range of anti-predator behaviors, physiologies, and morphologies. An intriguing subset of anti-predator adaptations minimizes this tradeoff between foraging and safety, allowing prey to carry on with fitness-enhancing activities even after they are detected by predators Such defenses include armor, spines, and noxious chemicals. We proceed to describe anti-predator defenses in fishes, insects, and microorganisms; the goal being to transition to taxa that become gradually more similar to single-celled cancer organisms In this overview, we categorize defenses as being armor-like, spine-like, or noxious. Matz et al (2008) found that violacein production per bacterium was 3–59 times higher for cells in biofilms than planktonic cells As they do for multicellular species, armored, spiny and noxious defenses allow microorganisms to defend in place, a behavior that is especially useful when foraging from resourcerich patches, or when a microorganism is sessile.

CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call