Abstract

Birds exhibit a specialized tail that serves as an integral part of the flight apparatus, supplementing the role of the wings in facilitating high performance aerial locomotion. The evolution of this function for the tail contributed to the diversification of birds by allowing them to utilize a wider range of flight behaviors and thus exploit a greater range of ecological niches. The shape of the wings and the tail feathers influence the aerodynamic properties of a bird. Accordingly, taxa that habitually utilize different flight behaviors are characterized by different flight apparatus morphologies. This study explores whether differences in flight behavior are also associated with variation in caudal vertebra and pygostyle morphology. Details of the tail skeleton were characterized in 51 Aequornithes and Charadriiformes species. Free caudal vertebral morphology was measured using linear metrics. Variation in pygostyle morphology was characterized using Elliptical Fourier Analysis, a geometric morphometric method for the analysis of outline shapes. Each taxon was categorized based on flight style (flap, flap-glide, dynamic soar, etc.) and foraging style (aerial, terrestrial, plunge dive, etc.). Phylogenetic MANOVAs and Flexible Discriminant Analyses were used to test whether caudal skeletal morphology can be used to predict flight behavior. Foraging style groups differ significantly in pygostyle shape, and pygostyle shape predicts foraging style with less than 4% misclassification error. Four distinct lineages of underwater foraging birds exhibit an elongate, straight pygostyle, whereas aerial and terrestrial birds are characterized by a short, dorsally deflected pygostyle. Convergent evolution of a common pygostyle phenotype in diving birds suggests that this morphology is related to the mechanical demands of using the tail as a rudder during underwater foraging. Thus, distinct locomotor behaviors influence not only feather attributes but also the underlying caudal skeleton, reinforcing the importance of the entire caudal locomotor module in avian ecological diversification.

Highlights

  • Understanding the processes that generate phenotypic diversity is an important goal in evolutionary biology [1,2]

  • The two analyses, MANOVA and Phylogenetic Flexible Discriminant Analysis (pFDA), give ostensibly conflicting results regarding the association between free caudal vertebral morphology and flight behavior

  • Phylogenetic MANOVAs identified a significant difference in free caudal vertebral morphology among flight style groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the processes that generate phenotypic diversity is an important goal in evolutionary biology [1,2]. By testing hypotheses regarding the patterns and causes of morphological diversity in highly variable structures, we may better characterize the role that such variation has played in the diversification of clades [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The terminal element of the caudal skeleton is the pygostyle, represented by a single, co-ossified unit consisting of the fused caudal-most vertebrae, ranging from three to seven in number [18,23]. This serves as an attachment site for caudal musculature, tail feathers, and as an anchor for the tail fanning mechanism itself [16,18]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call