Abstract
The theoretical work of André Gorz has a narrower focus than does that of Bookchin. Its object is contemporary social relations in advanced industrial social formations and in particular capitalist social formations. In theorising his object Gorz appeals to Marx but the socio-ecological theory he arrives at has more in common with Bookchin than with any tenable reading of Marx. The key to this paradox is the implicit premise of Gorz’s general social theory which is one and the same with that of Bookchin, namely an anthropology of self-sufficiency. It is this premise which clouds Gorz’s reading of Marx and yields a theory of revolution as one of individual self-management which converges with Bookchin’s theory of revolution as self-activity.KeywordsProductive ForceProductive RelationLabour ProcessRadical EcologyTechnical ActivityThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.