Abstract

It has been reported in non-contingent schedules that the variety of patterns of behavior is affected by the temporal variation of water deliveries. While temporal variation is accomplished by delivering water at fixed or variable times, spatial variation is usually accomplished by varying the number of dispensers and distance among them. Such criteria do not consider the possible ecological relevance of the location of water dispensers. Nevertheless, it is plausible to suppose that the intersection of the programed contingencies (e.g., time-based schedules), the ecological differentiated space (e.g., open vs. closed zones), and the relative location of relevant objects and events (e.g., location of the water source—peripherical vs. center zone) could set up an integrated system with the behavioral patterns of the organism. In the present study, we evaluated the eco-functional relevance of two locations of the dispensers upon behavioral dynamics in Wistar rats using fixed and variable time schedules in a modified open-field system. In Experiment 1, three subjects were exposed to a fixed time 30-s water delivery schedule. In the first condition, the water dispenser was located at the center of the experimental chamber. In the second condition, the water dispenser was located at the center of a wall of the experimental chamber. Each location was present for 20 sessions. In Experiment 2, conditions were the same, but a variable time schedule was used. Routes, distance to the dispenser, recurrence patterns, time spent in zones, entropy, and divergence were analyzed. Our findings suggest a robust differential relevance of the location of the dispensers that should be considered in studies evaluating behavioral dynamics. Results are discussed from an integrative, ecological-parametric framework.

Highlights

  • IntroductionTwo approaches to the analysis of behavior have taken place: the arbitrary and the ecological (Timberlake, 1990)

  • In behavioral science, two approaches to the analysis of behavior have taken place: the arbitrary and the ecological (Timberlake, 1990)

  • In order to test this hypothesis, in the present study, we evaluated the relevance of two ecological locations of the dispenser upon the spatial dynamics of behavior in Wistar rats under two temporally scheduled deliveries in a modified openfield system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Two approaches to the analysis of behavior have taken place: the arbitrary and the ecological (Timberlake, 1990). The ecological perspective emphasizes the following: (1) the functional differences of the experimental space and their effects on the behavior patterns, for example, the forward-going tendency, the centrifugal swing, the direction of food turn (Maier and Schneirla, 1964); (2) the role of locomotor activity on changes in the contact stimulation; (3) animals responding to invariants as well to changes in stimulation, that is, to the permanent properties of the environment as well as to their own motions; and (4) animals’ capacities of locomotion in and of orientation to their environment (Gibson, 1979) The arbitrary perspective presents the following strengths: (1) it separated the study of behavior from questionable explanations in terms of “mental life” or animal instincts; (2) it focused on the development of general theories; (3) it encouraged the development of standardized experimental tasks and paradigms allowing the comparison of general processes in different species—including humans (Timberlake, 1984); and (4) it encouraged the development of a parametric system for the study of behavioral processes (Schoenfeld et al, 1972).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call