Abstract

Sex differences in ornamentation are common and, in species with conventional sex roles, are generally thought of as stable, due to stronger sexual selection on males. Yet, especially in gregarious species, ornaments can also have non-sexual social functions, raising the possibility that observed sex differences in ornamentation are plastic. For example, females may invest in costly ornamentation more plastically, to protect body and reproductive ability in more adverse ecological conditions. We tested this hypothesis with experimental work on the mutually-ornamented common waxbill (Estrilda astrild), supplementing their diets either with pigmentary (lutein, a carotenoid) or non-pigmentary (vitamin E) antioxidants, or alleviating winter cold temperature. We found that both lutein and vitamin E supplementation increased red bill colour saturation in females, reaching the same mean saturation as males, which supports the hypothesis that female bill colour is more sensitive to environmental or physiological conditions. The effect of vitamin E, a non-pigment antioxidant, suggests that carotenoids were released from their antioxidant functions. Alleviating winter cold did not increase bill colour saturation in either sex, but increased the stability of female bill colour over time, suggesting that female investment in bill colour is sensitive to cold-mediated stress. Together, results show that waxbill bill sexual dichromatism is not stable. Instead, sexual dichromatism can be modulated, and even disappear completely, due to ecology-mediated plastic adjustments in female bill colour.

Highlights

  • Sex differences in ornamentation are common and, in species with conventional sex roles, are generally thought of as stable, due to stronger sexual selection on males

  • For female bill colour saturation, we found a significant interaction between diet treatment and time, indicating that changes in bill colour saturation differed between treatments

  • Post hoc tests showed that changes in female bill colour saturation differed between the control treatment and lutein supplementation and not vitamin E supplementation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sex differences in ornamentation are common and, in species with conventional sex roles, are generally thought of as stable, due to stronger sexual selection on males. Females may invest in costly ornamentation more plastically, to protect body and reproductive ability in more adverse ecological conditions We tested this hypothesis with experimental work on the mutually-ornamented common waxbill (Estrilda astrild), supplementing their diets either with pigmentary (lutein, a carotenoid) or non-pigmentary (vitamin E) antioxidants, or alleviating winter cold temperature. In animals with conventional sex roles, reproduction in females is limited by their physiology, while males can differ greatly in reproductive success depending on the number of mates and fertilizations and, experience strong sexual ­selection[1,2] This explains why it is common that sexual ornamentation is present only in males or, in mutually-ornamented species, that males are the more ornamented ­sex[1,3,4,5]. Imply trade-offs with other functions, sex differences in life-history could cause females and males to adjust investment in ornaments differently, giving rise to sex differences in the phenotypic plasticity of ornamentation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call