Abstract

Nearly every industry classification is experiencing slow growth and increasing concentration. Seldom do researchers have an opportunity to observe an emerging industry segment with as much promise as the smart home ecosystem, an exponentially growing industry. The study presents a novel approach using industry life cycle model and a coopetition framework to understand the process of the ecosystem development. Building on recent literature suggesting companies that purposefully match strategy to life cycle stage, the paper describes the strategic motivations and critical factors involved in the competition-based evolution of smart home ecosystems from early to growth phases, leading to a decision among the largest competitors to engage in coopetition. Following life cycle theory, in a mature phase, we forecast companies will attempt to differentiate by leveraging their brands, services, and bundles to drive differentiation. The standardization discussed in industry life cycle research is complemented by using the collaboration model required for complex and highly integrated systems. We provide four propositions and discussion of implications for future research and practice.

Highlights

  • At the heart of strategic management literature is the quest for firm survival and competitive advantage (Porter, 1980)

  • We introduce a coopetition framework to explain the cooperation among competitors required to coalesce around an industry standard1 as the catalyst needed to break through current challenges

  • We address the need for research related to service as a means for firm differentia­ tion during mature phases of life cycle (Cusumano et al, 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At the heart of strategic management literature is the quest for firm survival and competitive advantage (Porter, 1980). Industry life cycle (ILC) is a lens through which to view the strategic positioning process – through industry evolution and firm adaptation (Agarwal et al, 2002; Jovanovic and MacDonald, 1994; Karniouchina et al, 2010). Viability over the long term (across multiple stages in the life cycle) requires firms oper­ ating in the industry to adjust strategy to create and capture value (Dyer et al, 2018; Karniouchina et al, 2010; Ritala and Tidstrom, 2014). Firms that are purposeful and proactive in matching their strategies to life cycle stages may create and capture more value and increase like­ lihood of survival versus those who do not When offering fully integrated solutions, firms must increasingly rely on partners and ecosystem participants (Porter and Heppelmann, 2015)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call