ECOG-ACRIN E2197: Comparison of HER2 gene expression by RT-PCR across all HER2 immunohistochemistry groups with recurrence analysis.

Abstract

515 Background: Accurate assessment of HER2-low [immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ and in-situ hybridization negative] breast cancer is clinically relevant following DESTINY-Breast04. In hormone receptor positive breast cancers, Oncotype DX assay Recurrence Score results are widely used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy selection, and standardized quantitative HER2 mRNA reference-normalized expression levels by RT-PCR are included in patient reports. Previously, a high degree of concordance between central IHC and quantitative HER2 by RT-PCR was demonstrated in E2197. Here, we compare quantitative HER2 gene expression using Oncotype DX assay within all IHC subgroups and risk of recurrence in E2197. Methods: Data analyzed were from a case-control sample from E2197 (no adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy) of 755 patients. Central IHC for HER2 used duplicate 1.0 mm microarrays (HercepTest, Dako) and scored per 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Based on quantitative reference-normalized RT-PCR measures of HER2 expression, cases were assigned: positive ≥11.5 units, equivocal ≥10.7 to <11.5 units, and negative <10.7 units (1 unit increase represents ~2-fold increase in RNA). Spearman’s rank correlation was used to measure strength of association between the 2 methods. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between quantitative HER2 expression and recurrence (defined as invasive breast cancer in local, regional, or distant sites). Analyses were weighted to account for study design. Results: 48% were IHC 0, 11% were IHC 1+, 23% were IHC 2+, and 18% were IHC 3+. 85% were HER2 negative, 3% equivocal, and 11% positive by RT-PCR. While there was moderately strong correlation between HER2 IHC and HER2 gene expression by RT-PCR [Spearman’s rho: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.67); p<0.001], there were wide and overlapping ranges of HER2 gene expression across all IHC categories with almost identical medians and inter-quartile ranges for HER2 IHC 1+ and 2+ (n=248; see table). An exploratory analysis showed 86% of IHC 0, 97% of IHC 1+, and 99% of IHC 2+ had HER2 >8 units. After controlling for baseline clinicopathologic features (age, hormone receptor status, grade, size, and nodal status), continuous quantitative HER2 expression was associated with time to recurrence in HER2 IHC 0 to 2+ [HR 1.17 per 1-unit increase in HER2 (95% CI 1.01, 1.35; p=0.036)]. Conclusions: There was a wide range of quantitative HER2 gene expression using Oncotype DX assay across all IHC categories; continuous HER2 expression is independently associated with recurrence. Quantitative HER2 expression may be useful for identification of HER2-low breast cancer. Further studies are needed. [Table: see text]