Abstract

During nightly foraging activity, echolocating bats drink by flying low over the water surface and dipping the lower jaw while avoiding further bodily contact with the water. This task poses different sensorimotor challenges than flying in the open to forage for insects. Of interest is how bats adjust the timing of their echolocation pulses to accommodate the surrounding scene, from the progressively nearer water surface itself to objects at longer distances. Drinking behavior has been described in only a few of the roughly 1,000 echolocating bat species, and in none of the 110 species in the Indian subcontinent. Here, we describe how bats emitting frequency-modulated (FM) echolocation pulses behaved while drinking from a swimming pool in urban northeast India. At least two different bat species were present, using 1st-harmonic frequencies sweeping down to about 35 Hz ("low frequency") and down to about 50 kHz ("high frequency"), separable at a 40 kHz boundary. Over entire drinking maneuvers, intervals between broadcast pulses accommodate both the proximate task of registering the water surface while drinking and registering echoes from the farther reaches of the scene. During approach to the water, both low and high frequency bats emit longer, more stable interpulse intervals that matched the time interval covering echo arrival-times out to the frequency-dependent maximum operating range. High frequency bats use shorter interpulse intervals than low frequency bats, consistent with the shorter operating range at higher frequencies. Bats then accelerate their pulse rate to guide the dive down to drinking, with low frequency bats continuing to decrease pulse intervals and high frequency bats maintaining a more steady interval during the drinking buzz. The circumstance that both groups were engaged in the same task made this a natural experiment on the behavior during approach.

Highlights

  • Research on echolocation is concerned with what bats perceive, how the sounds they broadcast affect their perceptual space, and how differences in the emitted sounds relate to perception in the context of the surrounding scene [1]

  • Individual bats were observed flying down to swoop over the water surface, and accelerating the accompanying FM echolocation pulses in repetition rate, thereby decreasing interpulse intervals (IPIs) (Fig 2)

  • Based on the distribution of IPIs within the bouts, we considered a succession of pulses with IPI > 20 ms as approach pulses and those with IPI < 20 ms as drinking buzzes; this 20 ms cut-off value is consistent with the definition of drinking buzzes in [12, 14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research on echolocation is concerned with what bats perceive, how the sounds they broadcast affect their perceptual space, and how differences in the emitted sounds relate to perception in the context of the surrounding scene [1]. Work typically involves setting up laboratory models of natural tasks, such as target detection, tracking, and discrimination, to mimic conditions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call