Echocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Function and Clinical Outcomes After Successful Mitral Valve Repair: Conventional Two-Dimensional Versus Speckle-Tracking Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to compare conventional echocardiographic versus speckle tracking-derived parameters in predicting postoperative left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and clinical outcomes after successful mitral valve repair in patients with mitral regurgitation. In 147 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm with severe MR, two-dimensional echocardiography and speckle-tracking imaging for global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains and strain rates were performed within 30 days before successful mitral valve repair. Echocardiography was repeated within 7 days in all patients, and more than 3 months after surgery in 112 patients. Clinical events were evaluated for 21±17 months. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that preoperative LV systolic dimension (p=0.004) and volume (p=0.001) were independent determinants of immediate postoperative LV ejection fraction. Preoperative LV end-systolic dimension (p=0.004), LV ejection fraction (p=0.017), and circumferential strain (p=0.029) were independent predictors of late follow-up LV ejection fraction. By Cox regression analysis, preoperative end-systolic LV dimension (hazard ratio 1.26 for every 1 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.44, p<0.001) was the only predictor of hospital admission for heart failure. The best cutoff values of LV end-systolic dimension (≥41 mm) and volume (≥85 mL) for predicting postoperative severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction<0.35) identified patients at high risk for event-free survival, but those of speckle-tracking parameters did not. Preoperative LV remodeling parameters, such as LV end-systolic dimension and volume, are superior to speckle tracking-derived deformation parameters in predicting LV dysfunction and clinical events after successful mitral valve repair in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.