Abstract

BackgroundPresented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes.MethodsEave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this “model village”, LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications.ResultsInitial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels.ConclusionsThese trials suggest that the “eave tube” package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions.

Highlights

  • Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes

  • Overnight release‐recapture The mosquitoes used for the overnight release-recapture experiments were Anopheles arabiensis from a colony maintained at the Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), originally derived from local mosquitoes collected at a nearby village (Sagamaganga), Tanzania and maintained in this setting for several years

  • Placement of eave tubes at eave height (180 cm above the ground) resulted in the highest reduction in recapture relative to the control treatment, where clean netting was placed in the eave tubes, which is a 62 % reduction in recapture when insecticide-treated netting was used in the eave tubes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. The eave tube technology (which is introduced in [3]) exploits the natural behavioural ecology of the mosquitoes that transmit malaria in sub-Saharan Africa These mosquitoes have a strong preference for entering homes through the gaps between the walls and the roof—i.e. the eaves [4,5,6,7]. In addition to providing a physical barrier to house entry, eave tubes provide a mosquito killing effect—essentially turning the house into a “lure and kill” device This effect could potentially suppress mosquito populations or alter population age structures and achieve community level benefits when coverage is sufficiently high

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call