Abstract

Differing and confounding understandings of the seasonal movements of the delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) in the San Francisco Estuary persist nearly 2 decades after its listing as threatened under the federal and state endangered species acts. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation have characterized the delta smelt as a species that migrates extensive distances from Suisun Bay and the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers confluence in the fall and winter, eastward and upstream to the central and east Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta to spawn, with the next generation returning to downstream rearing areas in the following spring (OCAP Technical Support Team unpublished; USBR 2012). This description of inter-seasonal movements of delta smelt stands in contrast to findings drawn from previous studies, which describe movements by pre-spawner delta smelt from open waters in bays and channels to proximate marshlands and freshwater inlets (e.g., Moyle et al. 1992; Bennett 2005). In an effort to resolve this disagreement over the movements of delta smelt, we use publicly available data on its distribution drawn from trawl surveys to generate maps from which we infer seasonal patterns of dispersal. In the fall, before spawning, delta smelt are most abundant in Suisun Bay, the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers confluence, the lower Sacramento River, and the Cache Slough complex. By March and April, the period of peak detection of spawning adults, relative densities in Suisun Bay and the rivers’ confluence have diminished in favor of higher concentrations of delta smelt in Montezuma Slough and the Cache Slough complex. A relatively small percentage of fish are observed in areas of the Sacramento River above Cache Slough. We conclude that inter-seasonal dispersal of delta smelt is more circumscribed than has been previously reported. This conclusion has real-world implications for efforts to conserve delta smelt. Our findings support a conservation strategy for delta smelt that focuses on habitat restoration and management efforts for tidal marsh and other wetlands in north Delta shoreline areas directly adjacent to open waters that have been documented to support higher concentrations of the fish.

Highlights

  • From assessments of gene flow to projections of metapopulation dynamics, virtually every essential aspect of conservation planning calls for an understanding of patterns of movement by targeted at-risk species

  • Elusive is the fish throughout its annual life cycle, it has not been observed spawning in nature (Moyle 2002; Bennett 2005); and, while its distributional range has recently been resolved to the extent practicable using available surveys (Merz et al 2011), its dispersal patterns within that range remain in doubt

  • Data are available for juvenile and adult delta smelt from the Fall Midwater Trawl Survey (FMWT) back to 1967, here we present survey results from 1987 onward in our comparisons of life-stage distributions, concordant with the introduction to the estuary of the Asian clam (Potamocorbula amurensis), which is believed to be responsible for major changes in the delta food web (Alpine and Cloern 1992; Greene et al 2011; Nichols et al 1990; Winder and Jassby 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From assessments of gene flow to projections of metapopulation dynamics, virtually every essential aspect of conservation planning calls for an understanding of patterns of movement by targeted at-risk species. Because the fish is small, nearly transparent, and preternaturally fragile, the movements of delta smelt have proven exceptionally difficult to track in the turbid waters of the estuary. Elusive is the fish throughout its annual life cycle, it has not been observed spawning in nature (Moyle 2002; Bennett 2005); and, while its distributional range has recently been resolved to the extent practicable using available surveys (Merz et al 2011), its dispersal patterns within that range remain in doubt (but see Bennett 2005). Data from a series of trawl surveys in the estuary suggest that different delta smelt life stages use different areas of the estuary’s water bodies and channels. Since with few exceptions, delta smelt are not directly observed in those habitats and cannot readily be marked or tagged, many uncertainties remain about the details of delta smelt movements (Sommer et al 2011)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call