Abstract

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) plans to establish a sole risk-based set of regulations for drones to grant access to European airspace, thus opening a multibillion-euro market. One part of this new regulation set is the so-called “open” category, imposing only a minimum set of regulations. The EASA’s approach presents a strong converse to traditional and prescriptive airworthiness regulations. For decades, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been state-of-the-art assets in military forces. Aiming at the fulfilment of complex missions in extreme environments, in different theatres of operation, and with different partners, military UAS need to be reliable, safe, and interoperable. Therefore, NATO established internationally accepted airworthiness standards. However, these standards might be too severe to be adhered to by small, commercial, off-the-shelf UAS in the up-to-25 kg category, preventing the military from benefiting from the now fast-growing civil drone market. Based on a sound literature review, the paper presents the EASA’s upcoming regulations for civil UAS and discusses if they are applicable to military UAS. Possible opportunities, challenges, and limitations of applying the approach for the military are shown.

Highlights

  • Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), or just “drones”have emerged from being a purely military asset to being a sophisticated tool for professional civil applications and model aircraft enthusiasts

  • UA MTOM ≥ 0.25 kg: Remote pilot competence must be demonstrated via an online training and online test in a format to be defined by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), provided by an entity, recognized by the competent authority (UAS.OPEN.020(3)(b))

  • Remote pilot competence must be demonstrated via an online training and online test in a format to be defined by EASA, provided by an entity, recognized by the competent authority (UAS.OPEN.040(2))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), or just “drones”. One can say that the higher the risk of UAS operation, the more the competent aviation authority must be involved [6,7,8,9] This new regulatory approach is a significant step within European aviation regulations. While within the military community, airworthiness standards for UAS comparable to the Certified Category of EASA are quite common, the military community struggled and still struggles with the harmonization of UAS comparable to the “open” category which do not fulfill traditional airworthiness requirements but are already in use across military nations To overcome this issue in Europe, the European Defence Agency (EDA) has been ordered to create a harmonized set of regulations similar to the upcoming civil regulations [17]. The possible opportunities for aligning civil and military regulations for UAS are shown

The European UAS Regulation Approach
UAS Market Regulation
UAS Operations Regulation
Part UAS
UAS AMC GM
Conclusion
Manned versus Unmanned Aviation Safety
Aspects
Protection of People on the Ground
Required Pilot Competence
Required UAS Class
UAS with active electronic identification and updated geo-awareness systems
Requirements of the Product
C4—6 Requirements
Requirements on Organisations
Interaction
Applicability of the “Open” UAS Category to Military UAS Operations
Military UAS Operation Requirements
Competence of Military Remote Pilots
Military Requirements of the Product
Requirements of Military Forces for Organisations
Results and Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.