Abstract
Relatively little research has been conducted to systematically quantify the nationwide earthquake risk of gas pipelines in the US; simultaneously, national guidance is limited for operators across the country to consistently evaluate the earthquake risk of their assets. Furthermore, many challenges and uncertainties exist in a comprehensive seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines. As a first stage in a systematic nationwide assessment, we quantify the earthquake risk of gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous US due to strong ground shaking, including the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we integrate the US Geological Survey 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model, a logic tree–based exposure model, three different vulnerability models, and a consequence model. The results enable comparison against other risk assessment efforts, encourage more transparent deliberation regarding alternative approaches, and facilitate decisions on potentially assessing localized risks due to ground failures that require site-specific data. Based on the uncertainties approximated herein, the resulting sensitivity analyses suggest that the vulnerability model is the most influential source of uncertainty. Finally, we highlight research needs such as (1) developing more vulnerability models for regional seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines; (2) identifying, prioritizing, and measuring input pipeline attributes that are important for estimating seismic damage; and (3) better quantifying seismic hazards with their uncertainties at the national scale, for both ground failures and ground shaking.
Highlights
The US manages the largest gas pipeline network in the world
This paper aims to systematically quantify the earthquake risk and its sources of uncertainty for onshore gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous United States (CONUS) subjected to strong ground shaking
We focus on two empirical repair rates (RRs) models that have been accepted by the profession for regional seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines
Summary
The US manages the largest gas pipeline network in the world. The gas pipeline network provides fuel for electricity generation and different modes of transportation; it is a vital asset for all phases of disaster recovery (Applied Technology Council 2016). As of 2018, distribution, transmission, and gathering lines compose, respectively, about 87.5, 11.8, and 0.7% of the total mileage (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 2020b). This paper focuses on the onshore transmission lines within the conterminous United States (CONUS) due to data availability. Many diverse stakeholders work together towards ensuring the safety of gas transmission pipelines.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.