Abstract

The SEC and capital market participants are concerned that the increasing amounts of fees companies pay to their auditors for non-audit services may give auditors economic incentives to compromise their independence, resulting in lower quality audits and, thus, lower quality earnings. Using recent proxy statement disclosures of audit and non-audit fees, and controlling for variables known to be related to earnings management, we find that client firms paying high proportions of non-audit fees have income-increasing discretionary and total accruals. This suggests that auditors may be less diligent in curbing income-increasing earnings management for client firms from which they receive high proportions of non-audit fees.Our results are robust to alternative specifications of accrual models, surrogate measures of high non-audit fees, and the inclusion of additional explanatory variables.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call