Abstract
Generalship has been a topic of much debate throughout the years and the RUSI Journal has played an active role by publishing many articles on the topic. Russell Glenn here analyses this contribution, and asks whether the improvements in Generalship after the First World War can be attributed to the offerings of the Journal of the Royal United Services Institution? Though it is difficult to establish whether its role has been decisive in the process of improvement, Mr Gleen believes that the Journal has acted as a catalyst for identifying the traits necessary to senior leadership in the period 1914–1948 and has provided food for thought in the field. The Journal has ensured that the generals of the Second World War knew the errors of their predecessors and the expectations they were likely to meet.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
