Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite research demonstrating that attainment-based grouping has little, if any, overall benefits there is an increasing trend towards ability grouping in the early years. Using an ethnographic case study the article demonstrates how different pedagogical approaches are used with different ‘ability’ groups. The pedagogical experiences of children, especially within ‘low’ ability groups potentially limit children’s exposure to the tools required for successful participation in school. This varied pedagogy serves to govern, limit and constrain some young children’s aspirations and expectations and operates as a self-fulfilling prophecy. When the perception of ‘ability’ is seen as fixed, it influences the interactional experiences of children within different groups which, consequently, enhances or contains children’s future participation in school activity. The article concludes by suggesting that early years ability grouping needs to be contested and alternative pedagogies tried. This requires a reduction in ‘high stakes’ performance data and trust placed in early years teachers’ pedagogical decision-making processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.