Early to Mid-Term Follow-up of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients <35 Years

Abstract

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Younger age remains at the forefront of discussion when deciding between total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and the ankle arthrodesis (AA) for treatment of end stage ankle arthritis. Unlike in the hip and knee, ankle arthritis is typically post-traumatic and presents at a much younger patient age. With the goal of preserving ankle motion, improving function and limiting adjacent joint degeneration, TAA has been shown to be safe and effective in patients < 55 years of age. However, it is not uncommon for debilitating ankle arthritis to occur in individuals within their fourth or even third decade of life resulting in significant patient comorbidity. The purpose of our study was to evaluate patient reported outcome measures and survivorship after primary TAA in patients < 35 years old. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients < 35 years old who underwent primary TAA at a single institution from 2007-2020. Patient demographics, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. All patients had a minimum clinical follow up of 2 years. Patient reported outcome measures collected included VAS, SMFA dysfunction index, SF-36 and AOFAS hindfoot scores. Outcome measures were evaluated preoperative, 1 year postoperative, and at final follow up. Paired t-tests were performed to compare individual patients’ changes in PRO from preoperative to postoperative timepoints. Implant survivorship was evaluated as well as complications related to the index procedure. Implant survivorship based on need for complete revision of either the tibial or talar component Results: Twelve patients were included in the study. Average age at surgery was 28.5 years. Mean follow-up was 7.2 years. Mean VAS improved from 53.8 preoperatively to 14.7 (p= 0.152) at 1-year and 12.5 (p= 0.045) at final follow up, respectively. Mean SMFA improved from 40.0 preoperatively to 27.1 (p= 0.018) at 1-year and 24.0 (p= 0.006) at final follow up, respectively. SF-36 and AOFAS hindfoot scores also improved at 1 year and final follow-up compared to preoperative values [SF-36: 45.3 to 60.2 (p=0.06) and 67.0 (p=0.016); AOFAS: 40.6 to 70 (p= 0.08) and 68.9 (p=0.068)]. One patient required talar component revision due to aseptic loosening. One patient required subsequent removal of heterotopic bone due to impingement. No patients developed infection requiring surgical intervention. Conclusion: The onset of ankle arthritis typically occurs at a much younger age compared with that of the hip and knee and has a detrimental impact on patient quality of life. Despite a young age and increased activity demands, our results demonstrated that patients < 35 with end-stage ankle arthritis undergoing TAA demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes greater than 2 years after surgery. Survivorship of TAA in our study was 91.7% at a mean follow-up of 7.2 years. We believe that TAA is a safe, effective and durable option for very young patients with high patient satisfaction at early to mid-term follow up.