Abstract

Expanded abstractCitationKang DH, Kim YJ, Kim SH, Sun BJ, Kim DH, Yun SC, Song JM, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Song JK, Lee JW, Sohn DW: Early surgery versus conventional treatment for infective endocarditis. N Engl J Med 2012, 366: 2466-2473.BackgroundThe timing and indications for surgical intervention to prevent systemic embolism in infective endocarditis (IE) remain controversial. This trial compares clinical outcomes of early surgery and conventional treatment in patients with IE.MethodsObjectiveTo determine the effect of early surgery (<48 hours) to decrease the rate of death or embolic events as compared with conventional treatment for IE.DesignProspective randomized trial.SettingTwo academic medical centers in Korea.SubjectsAdult patients with left-sided, native-valve IE and a high risk of embolism.InterventionValve repair or replacement with removal of vegetation within 48 hours of random assignment versus no early surgery.OutcomesComposite primary endpoint of in-hospital death and embolic events occurring within 6 weeks after random assignment. Secondary endpoints, at 6 months, included death from any cause, embolic events, recurrence of IE, and repeat hospitalization due to the development of congestive heart failure.ResultsThirty-seven patients were assigned to the early-surgery group (<48 hours), whereas 39 were assigned to conventional therapy. Of the 39 randomly assigned to conventional therapy, 27 patients (77%) underwent surgery during the initial hospitalization and three during follow-up. One patient (3%) in the early-surgery group and nine (23%) in the conventional-treatment group reached the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.82; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 6 months in the early-surgery and conventional-treatment groups (3% and 5%, respectively; HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.66; P = 0.59). The rates of the composite endpoint of death from any cause, embolic events, or recurrence of IE at 6 months were 3% in the early-surgery group and 28% in the conventional-treatment group (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.65; P = 0.02).ConclusionsEarly surgery in patients with IE and large vegetations significantly reduced the composite endpoint of death from any cause and embolic events by effectively decreasing the risk of systemic embolism.

Highlights

  • The timing and indications for surgical intervention to prevent systemic embolism in infective endocarditis (IE) remain controversial

  • Early surgery in patients with IE and large vegetations significantly reduced the composite endpoint of death from any cause and embolic events by effectively decreasing the risk of systemic embolism

  • Commentary Even with recent advancement in modern health science, infective endocarditis (IE) remains a disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The timing and indications for surgical intervention to prevent systemic embolism in infective endocarditis (IE) remain controversial. Methods Objective: To determine the effect of early surgery (

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call