Early results on the efficacy and acceptability of a cardiac rehabilitation programme that transitioned to a fully virtual platform with adoption of wearable technology for covid era

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction Cardiaovascular prevention/rehabilitation programmes continue to reduce cardiovascular mortality even with contemporary treatment. During covid the majority of face-to-face programmes were suspended but these services have never been more crucial as control of cardiovascular risk factors can mitigate the morbidity/mortality risk from covid. Programmes must now however be delivered in a way that reduces patient exposure. Here we describe how we rapidly transitioned our previously fully face to face cardiovascular prevention/programme to a completely virtual platform adopting Fitbit as wearable technology. Methods The previously face-to-face initial assessment (IA) conducted by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) – nurse, dietician and physiotherapist is now delivered via video/phone as per patient preference. Patients are provided with equipment kits (tape measures, blood pressure monitors (BP), Fitbit smartwatches and Fibricheck app as required. The virtual IA includes assessment of: Smoking habit, blood pressure (BP), heart rate, lipid profile and HbA1c (taken in community phlebotomy hub), cardioprotective medications, weight, BMI, waist circumference, Mediterranean Diet Score, functional capacity via the Duke Activity Status Index, habitual activity levels, risk stratification for exercise, hospital anxiety and depression scores (HADS) and quality of life (QOL). Patients receive education and tailored advice with SMART goals as well as a written care plan. The subsequent 12 programme is comprised of Results Between April and November 2020 n=262 had a virtual IA (94% of those offered and n=114 (95% of those offered) attended an end of programme assessment. 64% were male and the mean age was 64.1 years. Acceptance of the Fitbit device was 72% of those offered. Table 1 below shows the main clinical and patient-reported outcomes in those attending both an IA and EOP with the data for the same 6 months the year prior (face to face programme) also for comparison. Programme satisfaction ratings were high with 85% rating the programme as excellent or very good. Conclusions Transitioning a previously fully face to face cardiac rehabilitation programme to a wholly virtual platform was feasible and acceptable to patients. Early data analysis would suggest that the virtual programme achieves similar clinical and patient reported outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Funded under Transformation Funding Programme, Department of Health, Northern Ireland Table 1