Abstract

Culture based methods are commonly employed to detect pathogens in food and environmental samples. These methods are time consuming and complex, requiring multiple non-selective and selective enrichment broths, and usually take at least 1 week to recover and identify pathogens. Improving pathogen detection in foods is a primary goal for regulatory agencies and industry. Salmonella detection in food relies on a series of culture steps in broth formulations optimized to resuscitate Salmonella and reduce the abundance of competitive bacteria. Examples of non-selective pre-enrichment broths used to isolate Salmonella from food include Lactose, Universal Pre-enrichment, BPW, and Trypticase Soy broths. Tetrathionate (TT) and Rappaport–Vassiliadis (RV) broths are employed after a 24-h non-selective enrichment to select for Salmonella and hamper the growth of competitive bacteria. In this study, we tested a new formulation of TT broth that lacks brilliant green dye and has lower levels of TT . We employed this TT broth formulation in conjunction with a 6-h non-selective pre-enrichment period and determined that Salmonella recovery was possible one day earlier than standard food culture methods. We tested the shortened culture method in different non-selective enrichment broths, enumerated Salmonella in the non-selective enrichments, and used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the proportional abundances of Salmonella in the TT and RV selective enrichments. Together these data revealed that a 6-h non-selective pre-enrichment reduces the levels of competitive bacteria inoculated into the selective TT and RV broths, enabling the recovery of Salmonella 1 day earlier than standard culture enrichment methods.

Highlights

  • The impact of Salmonella food contamination on public health has resulted in the development of several comprehensive culture-based methods to detect Salmonella in food

  • Among the selective broths inoculated with 103 CFU/mL Salmonella, the TT modification B (TTB) and TT modification A (TTA) selective broths had significantly higher recovery rates of 92 and 88% (P ≤ 0.001) compared to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) TT formulation (17%) (Table 2; Supplementary Table S1)

  • We were able to detect Salmonella one day earlier than the current FDA BAM method by reducing the non-selective pre-enrichment time in conjunction with a reformulation of TT broth. We tested this new strategy with different non-selective pre-enrichment broths and our results, comparing the efficacy of Lactose broth to Modified Buffered Peptone Water (mBPW), Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB), and Universal Pre-enrichment broth (UP), for Salmonella recovery from cilantro match previous studies with cantaloupes, mangos, and tomatoes which suggest that Lactose broth is not always optimal for Salmonella pre-enrichment (Hammack et al, 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impact of Salmonella food contamination on public health has resulted in the development of several comprehensive culture-based methods to detect Salmonella in food. Previous studies noted the importance of resuscitating stressed and injured Salmonella, so current methods utilize specific non-selective pre-enrichment broths to recover Salmonella from food (Rappaport et al, 1956; D’Aoust and Maishment, 1979; D’Aoust, 1981; Ray, 1989; Chen et al, 2013) Supplements such as bile salts, brilliant green dye, MgCl2, and malachite green dye are added to broths used for selective enrichment to reduce competitive bacteria in foods tested for Salmonella contamination (Teague and Clurman, 1916; Rappaport et al, 1956; Vassiliadis et al, 1978; Peterz et al, 1989). The low levels of Salmonella, enumerated from pine nuts (0.028–0.093 MPN/g) and paprika (0.04–0.05 CFU/g) implicated in recent outbreaks, highlight the need for non-selective pre-enrichment prior to selective enrichment to increase the probability of detection, especially for injured or stressed organisms that would not survive in selective enrichment broths (Lehmacher et al, 1995; Wang et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call