Early pyeloplasty versus conservative management of severe ureteropelvic junction obstruction in asymptomatic infants

Abstract

BackgroundUreteric-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common cause of antenatal and neonatal hydronephrosis and its management remains controversial. While conservative management is advocated for all, this strategy puts a quarter of these patients at risk for possibly irreversible renal damage. AimIn this study, we compare functional and anatomic outcomes in newborns and infants less than 1 year of age with high-grade unilateral UPJO, following early surgical pyeloplasty (ESP) versus conservative management (CM). Materials and MethodsThis was a single center prospective interventional study. Infants referred to our tertiary care pediatric surgery clinic between September 2016 and September 2018 with UPJO were considered. To be included patients must have been less than 1 year old, lack of clinical symptoms, suffer from severe hydronephrosis as defined by Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grades 3 or 4, and have affected kidney Split Renal Function (SRF) above 40%. Patients with bilateral disease, structural anomalies, or an abnormal voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) were excluded. Anatomical and functional outcomes were measured and compared at 6 and 12 months. ResultsFifty-six patients were assigned to receive either ESP (n = 28) or CM (n = 28). At 6 months Cortical thickness, polar length, and SFU indices were significantly lower in the ESP group, while none of the outcomes were significantly different between the two groups at 12 months. Despite the two groups not being different at 12 months regarding differential renal function (DRF), there was a significant decrease of function in the CM group compared to baseline. ConclusionWhen considering treatment options for infants with high-grade UPJO, it appears that ESP hastens improvement of anatomic and functional indices, while CM may lead to a significant deterioration in renal function.