Abstract
This study focuses on a boudin of Archean amphibolite that occurs in the Gridino eclogite-bearing mélange (Belomorian Province, eastern Fennoscandian Shield) and contains two varieties of eclogite. Eclogite-1 is banded, retrogressed (omphacite is totally replaced by clinopyroxene-plagioclase symplectite), and deformed by recumbent tight folds identical to those in the TTG-amphibolite host. Zircon groups are dated at 2721 ± 26 Ma (Zrn-I, fir-tree zoning, no or small negative Eu anomalies, flat HREE patterns, 700–730 °C, 14–15 kbar), ca. 2.70 Ga (Zrn-II, rims around Zrn-I, grains, 750–900 °C, 11–14 kbar, high-P granulite facies), and ca. 2.70 Ga (Zrn-III, rims around Zrn-II). Newly formed Paleoproterozoic zircon crystals are lacking. Retrogressed eclogite-1 in which amphibolization and epidotization totally obliterated garnet and plagioclase-clinopyroxene symplectites is intruded by 2646 ± 46 Ma old granodiorite. Eclogite-2 is massive, contains preserved omphacite-garnet-quartz-rutile assemblages, and comprises two patches whose boundaries truncate folds in eclogite-1. A Paleoproterozoic age of eclogite-2 is evidenced by previously published 1.90 Ga ages of zircon rims around Archean zircon and newly formed crystals with omphacite inclusions. The largest patch contains tabular enclaves of three varieties of amphibolites. One variety is identical to some bands of totally retrogressed eclogite-1 changed into monomineral amphibolites in both the Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic. The orientation and attitude of these tabular enclaves are coherent with those of the banding on limbs of recumbent tight folds in eclogite-1 within the boudin and later drag folds at its margins and form one and the same structural carcass or skeleton. These data along with recent findings of inherited 2.68 Ga old zircon with inclusions of omphacite in eclogite-2 indicate that this eclogite developed after Neoarchean eclogite-1 due to fluid infiltration along reactivated Neoarchean shear zones enveloping the boudin. These results favor the idea that the transition to the modern-style plate tectonics started not later than in the Neoarchean.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.