Abstract

Purpose: In the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, new technologies such as sutureless prosthetic valves and improved access via minimally invasive incisions offer a reduction in surgical trauma for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. It remains unclear whether a reduction in cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, or avoiding complete sternotomy offer improved early postoperative outcomes. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MiAVR) with sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR), and full sternotomy aortic valve replacement (FAVR).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call