Abstract

: Traditional coronary artery bypass grafting is performed using a hand sewn technique. The C-Port xA and Flex A anastomotic stapling devices (Cardica Inc., Redwood City, CA) were cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for use in distal coronary anastomoses in November 2006 and April 2007, respectively. They provide the ability to create a compliant, consistently reproducible, and automated anastomosis. Multidetector computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be effective in evaluating coronary artery bypass graft patency. : The first 24 patients to undergo internal mammary artery (IMA) anastomosis using the automated device in our practice were included in the study. Twenty-five IMA grafts (24 left IMA and 1 right IMA) were created using the C-Port xA or Flex A anastomotic device as part of multivessel off-pump coronary revascularization by sternotomy. Graft patency was evaluated at 30 days in the first 10 grafts and at 90 days in the next 15 grafts using multidetector (64 slice) CT. : There were no device failures. There were no perioperative strokes, myocardial infarctions, or deaths. All 10 IMA grafts evaluated at 30 days were patent using multidetector CT. One of the 15 IMA grafts studied at 90 days was occluded using multidetector computed tomography. : The C-Port xA and Flex A distal anastomotic devices provided a safe and effective means to create a left IMA-left anterior descending artery anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery with excellent short to midterm patency in this early experience. Long-term follow-up is warranted. These findings will have important implications for future sternal sparing coronary bypass surgery.

Highlights

  • Despite the presence of different pump techniques used in surgical myocardial revascularization, the optimal method used is still controversial

  • There was no differences among both groups, except for the number of patients undergoing redo CABG, which was significantly higher among ONCAB/ BH (13% Vs 3%, P = 0.025)

  • The incidence of main stem involvement was more among ONCAB/BH patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (8% Vs 4%, P = 0.765)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the presence of different pump techniques used in surgical myocardial revascularization, the optimal method used is still controversial. Nowadays we are confronted with different categories of patients varying from straightforward low risk cases to complicated ones due to the increase in number of elderly patients. The use of both conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and OPCAB among patients with impaired LVF proved its efficiency and safety [1,2]. ONCAB/BH technique was used to revascularize the myocardium among patients with impaired LVF. The results of such technique was compared to those who underwent off-pump beating heart

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call