Abstract

Information on patients’ preferences is essential to guide the development of more efficient genomic counseling service delivery models. We examined patient preferences in the context of use of a post-test genomic counseling framework on patients (n = 44) with chronic disease receiving online test reports for eight different diseases and one drug-response result. We also explored patients’ disease risk awareness, recall of test report information, and confidence in knowing what to do with their test results. Prior to the post-test genomic counseling session, all participants viewed at least one test report; 81.6% of available test reports were reviewed in total. Participants requested more phone (36) than in-person counseling sessions (8), and phone sessions were shorter (mean 29.1 min; range 12–75 min) than in-person sessions (mean 52.8 min; range 23–85 min). A total of 182 test reports were discussed over the course of 44 counseling sessions (mean 4.13, range 1–9). Thirty-six (81.8%) participants requested assessment for additional medical/family history concerns. In exploring patient experiences of disease risk awareness and recall, no significant differences were identified in comparison to those of participants (n = 199) that had received in-person post-test genomic counseling in a parent study randomized controlled trial (RCT). In summary, a novel post-test genomic counseling framework allowed for a tailored approach to counseling based on the participants’ predetermined choices.

Highlights

  • Novel approaches for effective genomic counseling are needed to meet increasing demand and to provide better efficiency

  • 60–90 min of Project (DP): Tobetween assess the utility a pre-established genomic counseling framework [15], an additional cohort of 55 patients with chronic disease was recruited to the OSUCPMC study

  • Receiving post-test genomic counseling with the new framework expressed confidence in knowing what to do with their test results, which was comparable to that of randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Novel approaches for effective genomic counseling are needed to meet increasing demand and to provide better efficiency. The continued integration of precision health into clinical practice will require re-evaluation of conventional approaches as more patients seek genomic counseling and testing. The conventional practice of in-person genetic counseling includes both pre-test and post-test components [1], an approach that is labor and cost-intensive [2] and impractical on a large scale [3,4].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call