Early Outcome Comparison of the Posterior Approach and the Superior Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Abstract

BackgroundThe superior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a minimally invasive, tissue-sparing technique that may have clinical and economic benefits. The purpose of this study was to compare early outcomes between the posterior approach and the superior approach in primary THA. Our hypothesis was that the superior approach would have a noninferior length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and blood loss compared with the posterior approach.MethodsAll primary THAs performed by a single surgeon at one institution were retrospectively reviewed over a 2-year period (2015-2017). There were 676 patients, 40.4% of whom underwent a posterior approach and 59.6% underwent a superior approach. LOS, discharge destination, blood loss, and operating room time were analyzed. Gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists status were recorded and controlled.ResultsThe posterior approach was independently associated with an almost threefold higher risk of prolonged LOS (>2 days, P < .001) (odds ratio: 2.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.87-4.49; P < .001). The mean LOS for the superior approach was 1.71 days vs 2.17 days for the posterior group (P < .001). Fewer patients in the superior approach cohort were discharged to a rehabilitation facility (8.9% vs 17.9%, P < .001). The mean operative time was shorter in the superior group (91.8 vs 95.8, P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference in acute postoperative blood loss. There were no dislocations or reoperations in either group.ConclusionsThe superior approach to THA was associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay and lower rate of discharge to rehab than the posterior approach. This approach can be used as a safe, minimally invasive, and tissue-sparing variation of a standard posterior approach for THA and has promising early outcomes.