Abstract

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries with promising outcomes. However, the use of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via early oral feeding compared to regular postoperative care in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.Materials and methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial at the Surgical Unit 1 Benazir Bhutto Hospital from August 2018 to December 2019. A total of 42 patients presenting to the emergency department with peritonitis secondary to suspected perforated duodenal ulcer were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A patients followed an ERAS protocol for early oral feeding, and Group B received regular postoperative care (i.e., delayed oral feeding). Our primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, the severity of pain (via the visual analog scale), and postoperative ileus duration. Results were analyzed via IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). and chi-square and independent t-tests were applied.ResultsPatients who received early oral feeding (Group A) showed a shorter length of hospital stay, lower pain scores, and shorter postoperative ileus duration than patients in the traditional postoperative care group. Also, we noted no duodenal repair site leak in the early oral feeding group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsBased on our results, ERAS protocols that promote early oral feeding can be applied in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for perforated duodenal repair. Early oral feeding in emergency surgery patients can reduce the patient burden on hospitals. In addition, early oral feeding can promote better outcomes and reduced economic burden for patients. Keywords: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, postoperative ileus.

Highlights

  • Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries with promising outcomes

  • This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via early oral feeding compared to regular postoperative care in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries

  • ERAS protocols that promote early oral feeding can be applied in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for perforated duodenal repair

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via early oral feeding compared to regular postoperative care in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of ERAS protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers, assessing the length of hospital stay, postoperative ileus, pain, and overcoming patient fears associated with perforation repair site leakage via early oral feeding

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call