Abstract

BackgroundAcute respiratory failure (ARF) remains the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission of immunocompromised patients. In the most severe cases, high-flow oxygen therapy may fail to ensure adequate gas exchange, and mechanical ventilation (MV) must be used. This scenario is associated with high mortality rates of 40 to 60%, depending on the cause of ARF and type of immune deficiency. The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in this situation has been criticized as potentially delaying the initiation of optimal treatment. In contrast, early NIV used prophylactically in patients with ARF who do not meet the criteria for invasive MV (IMV) may obviate the need for IMV, thereby decreasing the morbidity and mortality rates. We aim to demonstrate that a management strategy including early NIV decreases 28-day mortality rates compared to oxygen therapy alone in immunocompromised patients with ARF.Methods/DesignThis is a multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing early NIV to oxygen therapy alone in immunocompromised patients with ARF. All immunocompromised adult patients admitted to admission for ARF are eligible for randomization. Patient with ARF onset more than 72 hours earlier or ARF related to cardiogenic pulmonary edema or hypercapnia, or with a need for immediate endotracheal intubation or other organ failure are not eligible.After inclusion patient are allocated to receive early NIV (intervention arm) or oxygen therapy only (control arm).We plan to enroll 374 patients in 29 ICUs. An interim analysis is planned after the inclusion of 187 patients. The main objective is to demonstrate early NIV increases survival as compared to oxygen therapy alone. Other outcomes include the need of IMV, organ failure evolution, nosocomial infections rate, 6 months survival.DiscussionThis study is expected to demonstrate an improved 28-day survival in immunocompromised patients managed with early NIV.Trial registrationRegistration number: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01915719. Registered on 26 July 2013.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-372) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission of immunocompromised patients

  • This study is expected to demonstrate an improved 28-day survival in immunocompromised patients managed with early non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

  • This study has three major flaws: (a) the patients were recruited at a single center; (b) the mortality rate among patients managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) (IMV) was 90%, which is considerably higher than current rates; and (c) acute illness severity varied across patients, with some patients apparently meeting criteria for IMV at baseline and others having no criteria for severe ARF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission of immunocompromised patients. Mortality rates are highest in patients with severe respiratory distress requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). In this situation, mortality can reach 40% in organ transplant recipients and patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments [4], and 60% in patients with hematological or solid malignancies [1,2,3]. The use of NIV in patients with severe ARF has been criticized, as the failure rate is nearly 50% among immunocompromised patients and excess mortality occurs among patients who receive delayed IMV [5,6,7]. The result of an Italian study of 40 solid organ transplant recipients supports the beneficial effect of postoperative NIV on survival [12]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.