Abstract
Ever since Freud published his paper on "Screen Memories"<sup>1</sup>the significance of childhood recollections has been the subject of much investigation. Studies have generally fallen into two major categories, those reporting anecdotal accounts of early memories from autobiographical or clinical material<sup>2-6</sup>and those reporting early memory data and associated characteristics based on statistical compilations and inferences.<sup>7-10</sup>Generally, clinicians tended to use the former approach while academic psychologists focused on the statistical methods.<sup>11</sup>Another major difference in the approach to the study of early memories existed in the consideration of latent versus manifest content. Again while clinicians, particularly psychoanalysts, were more inclined to deal with latent content<sup>12-18</sup>other investigators seemed more concerned with the manifest content of the early memory.<sup>19-20</sup>These major differences of approach and focus stemmed largely from the two major theoretical positions formulated by Freud and Adler, who
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
