Abstract

Data on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to end-stage heart failure (ESHF) are limited. We hypothesised that earlier intervention with MCS in patients with CS due to ESHF at INTERMACS class 2 compared to INTERMACS 1 is associated with less organ dysfunction and better survival . Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data (November 2014 to July 2019) from a single centre. ESHF was defined by a diagnosis of HF prior to presentation with CS. Other causes of CS (eg: myocardial infarction) were excluded. Outcome was survival at 90 days. We included 60 patients with CS due to ESHF Differences in baseline characteristics were consistent with the different INTERMACS profiles [TABLE]. The primary and subsequent MCS modalities are shown in FIGURE 1. The duration of MCS was similar between INTERMACS 1 and 2 patients (15 (10-33) vs 14 (7-23) days, p=0.269). Compared to INTERMACS 2, INTERMACS 1 patients had more organ dysfunction on support and significantly lower 90-day survival (p=0.020 [FIGURE 2]. Earlier MCS in patients with CS due to ESHF at INTERMACS 2 was associated with less organ dysfunction and better 90-day survival compared to INTERMACS 1 patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.