Abstract

BackgroundEarly life social environment may influence breast cancer through shaping risk factors operating in early life, adolescence and adulthood, or may be associated with breast cancer risk independent of known risk factors. We investigated the associations between early life socioeconomic status (SES) and mammographic density, a strong risk factor for breast cancer, and the extent to which these associations were independent of risk factors across the lifecourse.MethodsWe used data from an adult follow-up study of two U.S. birth cohorts of women (average age = 43 years) with prospectively collected data starting during the pregnancy of the mother and continuing through early childhood of the offspring. We collected data on factors in later life periods through computer-assisted interviews with the offspring as adults, and obtained routine clinical mammograms for measurement of percent density and dense and nondense breast areas using a computer assisted method. We used generalized estimating equation models for multivariable analysis to account for correlated data for sibling sets within the study sample (n = 700 composed of 441 individuals and 127 sibling sets).ResultsHighest vs. lowest family income level around the time of birth was associated with smaller dense breast area after adjustment for early life factors (e.g., birthweight, maternal smoking during pregnancy) and risk factors in later life periods, including adult body mass index (BMI) and adult SES (β = −8.2 cm2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −13.3, −3.2). Highest vs. lowest parental educational attainment was associated with higher percent density in models that adjusted for age at mammogram and adult BMI (e.g., β = 4.8, 95% CI = 0.6, 9.1 for maternal education of college or higher degree vs. less than high school), but the association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after further adjustment for early life factors. There were no associations between early life SES indicators and non-dense area after adjustment for adult BMI. Neither adult education nor adult income was statistically significantly associated with any measure of mammographic density after adjusting for age and adult BMI.ConclusionsWe did not observe consistent associations between different measures of early life SES and mammographic density in adulthood.

Highlights

  • Life social environment may influence breast cancer through shaping risk factors operating in early life, adolescence and adulthood, or may be associated with breast cancer risk independent of known risk factors

  • Using prospectively collected early life data, we examined the associations between early life socioeconomic status (SES) and adult mammographic breast density, a measure of the amount of dense breast tissue as visualized on a mammogram and a strong and independent risk factor for future breast cancer risk [19,20,21,22,23]

  • We investigated the extent to which any observed associations were explained by 1) maternal and birth characteristics that have previously been associated with breast cancer risk, and 2) established risk factors for breast cancer in later life periods, including reproductive and lifestyle factors and adult SES

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Life social environment may influence breast cancer through shaping risk factors operating in early life, adolescence and adulthood, or may be associated with breast cancer risk independent of known risk factors. The majority of research on early life determinants of breast cancer risk has focused on proxies for pre- and postnatal hormonal exposures including birthweight, maternal pre-eclampsia, twin membership and childhood growth [2,3,4,5] Many of these exposures are in turn largely shaped by early life social environment, including parental socioeconomic status (SES) [6,7,8,9,10]. In addition to its relationship with early life hormonal exposures, early life social environment may represent other as yet unknown early life exposures that directly influence breast cancer risk It can indirectly influence breast cancer risk through shaping the development of risk factors for breast cancer operating in adolescence and adulthood, including reproductive events, lifestyle factors and adult socioeconomic circumstances. Strong biomarkers of risk may be used in lieu of breast cancer incidence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.