EARLY-LIFE EDUCATION AND COGNITIVE AGING: DOES CONTENT, LOCATION, AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT MATTER?

Abstract

Abstract Life course and cognitive aging theories about the sources of subgroup and individual differences in susceptibility to cognitive impairment frequently highlight the significance of early-life education, defined in research by total years of school and highest degree. A more nuanced approach could shed light on why and for whom education matters for brain aging processes. For example, one year of school in the 1930s may not be the same as one year in the 1960s, or in different school types and states in this historical period. In addition, post- high school training and degrees differ in content. Each paper in this symposium uses early-life education history and late-life cognitive data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Speakers discuss what guided their selection of specific education content, location, contexts and analytic strategy. Williams-Farrelly asks how individuals characterized by privileged high school educational experiences in the period from 1930 to the 1960s benefited in terms of social mobility and later-life cognitive functioning. Nkwata, in contrast, focuses on early-life education experiences that potentially limit the skills acquired together with exposure to family adversity and stress. Yu utilizes sequence analysis to identify and examine the association between late-life cognition and variations in patterns of K-12 education defined by duration and order of racial/ethnic composition. Walsemann and colleagues ask if state-level differences in the timing and implementation of school desegregation policies explain Black-White disparities in the transition to cognitive impairment in the US South. The session concludes with an integrative discussion by Zahodne.