Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a clinical diagnosis based on a combination of clinical and neurological signs, which occurs between the ages of 12 and 24 months. Cerebral palsy or a high risk of cerebral palsy can be accurately predicted before 5–6 months, which is the corrected age. This would allow the initiation of intervention at an early stage. Parents must be more involved in the development and implementation of the early therapy, increasing opportunities for parent–child interaction. The aim of this study was to learn from the perspectives of families with children under 12 months with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), what ingredients (barriers and facilitators) should be involved in early intervention so that we could co-design (researchers and families) a multidisciplinary guideline for a global intervention addressed to the needs of the child and the family. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at a time and venue convenient for the families. A total of ten families with experience in early intervention were invited to attend the interview with open questions: (1) What components should early intervention have for a baby diagnosed with UCP? (2) What components should early intervention have for the family? (3) What should the involvement of the family be in early intervention? (4) What barriers included in early intervention should be removed? From the data analysis, three key topics emerged and were subsequently named by focus group participants: (1) UCP early intervention components, (2) family involvement in early intervention of UCP, and (3) removing barriers and creating facilitators within early intervention. The participation of the families (mothers) in the co-design of the necessary ingredients within the scope of a multidisciplinary early intervention guide aimed at children with UCP under 12 months allows learning about their reality and not that of the therapist. The following list highlights the present barriers as perceived by the parents: intervention as spectators, therapeutic goals, clinic environment, and lack of empathy, and the possible facilitators determined by the parents during the implementation comprised teamwork, the family’s goals, motivation during the intervention, and learning at home. Thus, an early intervention program to improve global functionality should address family involvement through multidisciplinary coaching and the modification of the environment, encouraging family goals and family support through the family–therapist team.
Highlights
Cerebral palsy (CP) comprises a heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental conditions that present mainly as movement and posture disorders accompanied by musculoskeletal problems, sensory impairments, perception, communication and behavior disorders, epilepsy, and cognitive and sensorial deficits [1]
Based on the importance of including the family from the beginning of the research to create the intervention design and implementation of a motor approach, but a global approach for families and their children with UCP from an early age, we set ourselves the following objective: To learn from families’ perspectives with children under 12 months with unilateral cerebral palsy what the ingredients that exist in early intervention are in order to co-design a multidisciplinary guideline for a global intervention addressed to the needs of the child and the family
Parents with children under 12 months of age who have been diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy were recruited by convenience from a pediatric hospital, where the health professionals have previously suggested the participants as possible good communicators of experiences or life stories due to their involvement in the process of the diagnosis and intervention of their children
Summary
Cerebral palsy (CP) comprises a heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental conditions that present mainly as movement and posture disorders accompanied by musculoskeletal problems, sensory impairments, perception, communication and behavior disorders, epilepsy, and cognitive and sensorial deficits [1]. “Developmental disregard” can appear in children with low performance, and it is defined as a failure to use the potential motor functions and capacities of the affected arm and hand for spontaneous use in daily life [3]. This phenomenon impairs the use of the affected hand and disrupts bimanual co-ordination and interferes on the activities of daily living [4]. Before 5 months corrected age, magnetic resonance imaging plus the General Movements
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.