Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while neonatal mortality has fallen, the number of children under five with developmental disability remains unchanged. The first thousand days are a critical window for brain development, when interventions are particularly effective. Early Childhood Interventions (ECI) are supported by scientific, human rights, human capital and programmatic rationales. In high-income countries, it is recommended that ECI for high-risk infants start in the neonatal period, and specialised interventions for children with developmental disabilities as early as three months of age; more data is needed on the timing of ECI in LMICs. Emerging evidence supports community-based ECI which focus on peer support, responsive caregiving and preventing secondary morbidities. A combination of individual home visits and community-based groups are likely the best strategy for the delivery of ECI, but more evidence is needed to form strong recommendations, particularly on the dosage of interventions. More data on content, impact and implementation of ECI in LMICs for high-risk infants are urgently needed. The development of ECI for high-risk groups will build on universal early child development best practice but will likely require tailoring to local contexts.

Highlights

  • Ninety-nine percent of newborn deaths are in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and prematurity, intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (‘birth asphyxia’), sepsis and meningitis account for 75% of these [2]

  • For infants with developmental disability identified after the newborn period, emerging evidence suggests that a combination of community-based group sessions and home visits is the most successful delivery setting for Early Childhood Interventions (ECI) [29]

  • early child development (ECD) must include survivors of perinatal adversity who are at very high risk of developmental disability

Read more

Summary

The Challenge

Almost half of all deaths in children under five occur in the newborn period [1,2]. CBR arose from the primary care movement advocated at Alma Ata and has been described as ‘a strategy within general community development for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, and social inclusion of all people with disabilities...implemented through the combined efforts of people with disabilities themselves, their families and communities, and the appropriate health, education, vocational, and social services’ [16]. Given this strongly participatory philosophy, it describes a wide range of community initiatives which are situation-specific. Current Evidence on Early Intervention for Children at High Risk of Developmental

Why—The Rationale for Investment in Early Childhood Intervention
When to Implement and How to Reach the Right Children
What—Defining Early Intervention for Developmental Disability
Where to Conduct Early Childhood Intervention Programmes?
How—Implementing Early Childhood Intervention Programmes
What Next?
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.