Abstract

Abstract Background In paediatric cardiac surgery, there has been a paradigm shift in perioperative management from a slow wean of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), to “ultra fast-track” anaesthesia with early extubation (EE) in theatre to promote a faster recovery. Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) have multiple risk factors for prolonged intubation, including a greater proportion of re-do interventions, more co-morbidities and metabolic differences leading to slower emergence from anaesthesia. As a result, EE remains unproven and has not been widely adopted and in this patient group. Aim To assess the effects of EE on post-operative haemodynamics, hospital stay and associated healthcare costs. Methods Data were collected on ACHD patients, who underwent cardiac surgery in a high-volume tertiary centre between 2012 and 2018. Propensity score matching (1:1 or 2:1 where possible) was performed using the following variables: age, sex, body mass index, CHD complexity, functional class, length of surgery, systemic ventricular function, procedure-specific risk (adult congenital heart score; ACHS), urgent versus elective procedure, active endocarditis, pulmonary hypertension and renal dysfunction. Results 614 procedures were performed during the study period. After matching, 87 (14.2%) patients receiving EE were compared to 164 patients who received conventional care (CC). The overall complication rate was low, with no difference between the EE and CC groups (8.0% vs. 9.1%, p=0.77), and a very low reintubation rate (<1%). EE patients had a significantly shorter post-operative hospital length of stay in ICU and the high dependency unit (HDU; 48 [43–51] vs. 50 [47–69] hours, p<0.0001). EE patients required less inotropic & vasopressor support, as demonstrated by a lower Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) compared to patients following NEE (median VIS 0.5 [0.0–1.8] vs. 2.0 [0.0–3.5], p<0.0001). The total fluid balance by the third post-operative day was more positive after CC than EE (1177±737mL vs. 927±780mL, p=0.004). Finally, lower combined ICU and HDU costs were incurred by EE compared with CC (£3.9K[2.8–4.2K] vs. £4.2K[3.9–6.3K], p<0.0001). Conclusion In ACHD patients undergoing cardiac surgery, including complex and redo procedures, EE was safe, associated with a shorter ITU and HDU stay and lower hospital costs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call